← Directory

Etch

Free
★ 13 • Updated Sep 20, 2026, 03:34 PM

Etch is a signed audit chain for AI agent decisions.

Use Cases ▼
01

Record AI coding agent prompts, context, tool calls, and outcomes as signed events before shipping to production

02

Produce signed evidence bundles for compliance reviews mapped to EU AI Act, SOC 2, and ISO article or control IDs

03

Investigate and document prompt-injection attempts or anomalous agent behavior

04

Give external auditors offline, read-only verification of agent history without granting platform access

05

Share expiring read-only audit links with reviewers who have no account

06

Federate agent events across organizational boundaries using chain_id, epoch, and event_hash references

07

Attach HSM, TPM, or enclave attestation blobs to agent events in regulated environments

08

Write signed postmortems and retroactive annotations into the audit chain

What Problem It Solves ▼

AI agents make consequential decisions in production, but the logs that record those decisions are easy to alter and often prove little after the fact. A plain hash chain can show that entries were reordered or tampered with, yet it cannot establish who signed what. Etch addresses this by producing signed, epoch-anchored records of agent activity that a third party - an auditor, regulator, or court - can verify offline against pinned public keys without asking the vendor for cooperation.

Key Features ▼
✓

Hybrid post-quantum signatures (Ed25519 + FIPS 205 SLH-DSA-SHA2-128f) with offline verification against pinned public keys

✓

Free tier with 500 events over 14 days and no signup required

✓

MCP tools integrate with a wide range of AI coding agents

✓

Open-source reference verifier can be run by auditors without vendor cooperation

✓

Compliance mapping cites specific EU AI Act, SOC 2, and ISO article and control IDs

Overview

Etch is a signed audit chain for AI agent decisions. It records every agent action - the prompt, the context supplied, the tools called, and the resulting outcome - as a signed event. Each event is wrapped in a hybrid Ed25519 + FIPS 205 SLH-DSA-SHA2-128f signature envelope, hash-chained into epochs, and epoch-anchored to public infrastructure so that records remain verifiable long after they are written.

Full Description ▼

Verification is designed to be offline. An open-source reference verifier (etch-verify) lets a third party parse audit chains and export bundles on their own laptop against pinned public keys, with no network access and no vendor cooperation required. Etch cites a 760 MB manifest verified in roughly 42 seconds with under 200 MB peak RSS using streaming ijson parsing.

The product exposes three surfaces: a CLI verifier for terminals, MCP tools that drop into AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Cline, Codex, Continue, Copilot, Windsurf, Goose and others), and a web dashboard for reviewing, replaying, and sharing read-only links. Regulator-facing primitives include chain-of-custody export bundles aligned with Federal Rule of Evidence 902 and EU eIDAS, HSM/TPM/enclave attestation (tpm2, YubiKey, AWS Nitro, GCP Shielded, Azure Attestation, SEV-SNP, Intel TDX), cross-chain federation between organizations, and signed postmortems.

Etch positions itself as an evidence layer that proves what happened rather than a policy engine that decides what should happen. A free tier covers 500 events over 14 days with no signup, and a persistent project can be created at any time.

Pros & Cons

Pros

+

Hybrid post-quantum signatures (Ed25519 + FIPS 205 SLH-DSA-SHA2-128f) with offline verification against pinned public keys

+

Free tier with 500 events over 14 days and no signup required

+

MCP tools integrate with a wide range of AI coding agents

+

Open-source reference verifier can be run by auditors without vendor cooperation

+

Compliance mapping cites specific EU AI Act, SOC 2, and ISO article and control IDs

Cons

−

Early-stage product with limited traction (tens of thousands of signed events across a small number of projects)

−

Provides integrity and authorship evidence only; it does not validate whether an agent decision was correct

−

Open-source core repository has few stars and a small community

−

Advanced capabilities such as HSM attestation, cross-chain federation, and custody bundles appear aimed at enterprise tiers

−

Instrumenting existing agent pipelines requires MCP or API integration work

Similar Tools

LangSmith Langfuse Arize Phoenix AgentOps Helicone immudb

More in AI Agents